"This work continues to be scaffolded upon the concepts of the first and second parts, becoming increasingly interdependent and interwoven. The authors have been intentionally thoughtful about ensuring the lists of concepts are successive and build upon earlier concepts in the column series. The concepts covered are a representative sample and are not encompassing of all of the possible definitions, especially those that have definitions or uses outside of social justice or equity-related disciplines. We are cognizant that the list is not comprehensive, but a snapshot of appropriate concepts within our current United States institutional and societal climates.
We also recognize that some concepts’ definitions have evolved beyond their original purpose or definition, and specific understandings/uses may vary per region in the US. The nuances have been noted where appropriate to help guide readers. Additionally, our examples are a mix of real and fictitious scenarios, sometimes offering a solution and other times, a narrative of the issue in action. As a reminder, the concepts and examples are based on the authors’ lived experiences; however, there exists a large volume of resources and research, academic and otherwise, on these concepts if you wish to research them more deeply.
Furthermore, we realized that as we dug deeper into our work and understanding, we wanted to engage other scholars in the field for clarity and refining. In this column, we have invited more consultants than the previous column, and you will see their names listed in our acknowledgements. We appreciate their willingness to continue to engage with us all as we tackle some of the challenging concepts, especially as we try to present them as clearly and completely as we can." (Adapted from Bussmann, Altamirano, Hansen, Johnson, & Keer, 2021)
Definition: Grown out from disability activists’ call for equal access to public accommodations, it has come to mean when efforts are made to adapt an existing resource, space, service, or experience to be accessible to all, including but not limited to those who are disabled. Accommodations are usually provided only to those with recognized disabilities who ask for them or when the law requires the accommodation to be provided. Institutions are legally required to provide accommodations in order to be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. The word accommodation is also used to describe any action taken by organizations or institutions when they are compelled to facilitate basic access to a marginalized group (i.e., providing space suits that fit female astronauts or providing gender-inclusive restroom access) (APA, 2012; ADA National Network, n.d.).
Accommodation is also used in educational theory. This usage originated in Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, referring to the stage of development where a person adjusts their existing knowledge to fit new information instead of adjusting new information to fit their existing knowledge (Kibler, 2011).
Science Example: An astronomy department enrolls a blind student, and the department must accommodate their learning needs. They found one such tool called C.A.R.D.I.S. (Coordinates and Relative Dimension in Space), a tactile three-dimensional coordinate grid that can help make astronomy accessible for blind and visually impaired learners. Developed by Dr. Wanda Diaz-Merced, a practicing blind astronomer, and Dr. Kathy DeGioia Eastwood, C.A.R.D.I.S. can be easily put together from cheap, widely available materials. Similar to the way curb cuts or ramps help those in wheelchairs, as well as parents with strollers, and people pushing grocery carts, C.A.R.D.I.S. can also aid sighted students who find it hard to visualize three dimensional spaces (Astrosense, n.d.).
Definition: Allyship is an umbrella term for a spectrum of behaviors by members of dominant cultures who use their privilege to walk alongside, support, defend, and/or advocate for members of non-dominant cultures. This support can look like developing friendships with members of the marginalized group, participating in celebrations and cultural events, holding positive attitudes toward and using positive language about the marginalized group, and/or taking small or large actions toward cultivating in the dominant group acceptance and understanding of the marginalized group. This can include having an intention to be a comrade or partner in the pursuit of equity and equality for and/or with BIPOCs, LGBTQ people, or other marginalized groups. An ally might also be a deliberate disruptor of the systems, policies, procedures, and practices that negatively impact marginalized and minoritized experiences in disproportionate ways. While some allyship may be seen as timid, everyone’s circumstances are different and allyship is not measured by how it looks but by how supported the members of non-dominant groups feel.
Recently, the idea of people and groups labeling themselves “allies” has been critiqued because it can be seen as performative, e.g., corporations posting black squares in recognition of Black Lives Matter on social media and not also changing their hiring practices. One of the main thrusts of those making these critiques has been a push toward the activist side of the spectrum of allyship behaviors, specifically the ideas of standing in solidarity and being an accomplice. This critique of performativity recognizes that good intentions alone have either no impact or a harmful one.
The concept of standing in solidarity aims to shift members of the dominant culture from working for to working with non-dominant cultures. The concept of being an accomplice means not just working with but being led by non-dominant cultural leaders, whether or not they are in the room, and taking on the risks associated with challenging dominant power structures. These adaptations of allyship involve standing alongside members of non-dominant cultures and collaboratively supporting their work. This sometimes looks like taking action and sometimes looks like stepping back, but mostly it requires asking non-dominant cultures what their needs are and not assuming them (Indigenous Action, 2014; McKenzie, 2015; Clemens, 2017; Harden & Harden-Moore, 2019; Kim, 2020).
Science Example: The faculty members of a mathematics department published a statement to denounce the current and historical inequities women and BIPOC of all genders had faced in their department. Upon reading the statement, a Black woman PhD student approached the group and suggested they move beyond performative allyship into solidarity by supporting the work already being done by the Black Student Union and the student chapter of the Association of Women in Mathematics.
Definition: Originating in linguistics, code switching first meant the art of and/or the necessity to switch linguistic manifestations to adapt and maneuver within different contexts. Examples of linguistic code switching would be switching from “the King’s English” in meetings and speaking in a lay or informal dialect with colleagues of similar backgrounds, or it may be speaking in a native language to hide a conversation from colleagues. The definition has since expanded to encompass how one navigates institutional or dominant cultures and spaces through shifts in language and expression. It is an internal process for the individual dependent on their knowledge of and experience with the language and culture to which they are attempting to adapt. Additionally, these shifts are dependent on existing power structures. While everyone code switches to some extent, it is especially complex and important for people from non-dominant cultures and groups. In particular, members of non-dominant groups are expected to, and often need to for safety or professional reasons, conform to the norms and expectations of language and expression when in a dominant group’s space. In contrast, members of the dominant group are not likely to be expected to or need to change their language or expression when in a non-dominant group’s space.
Science Example: When she started graduate school in chemistry at a school in the Northeastern USA, Yasmin tried to lessen her southern accent as much as possible because she knew that her teachers and fellow students would be less likely to view her as intelligent and capable because of it, though it came back strongly every time she called home. Then when she visited back home over winter break, she found that she often had to consciously shift from using the technical language of the lab back into a more colloquial form when talking with her family about her time and work in graduate school (Fields 2012).
Definition: A teaching framework originally developed in the 1970s by Brazilian adult literacy educator Paolo Freire that combines theory and practice into praxis of reflective teaching. Educators around the world, such as bell hooks, have adapted and expanded this theory to fit their various disciplines and contexts. Critical pedagogy is based on critical theory and emphasizes the integration of social justice, political awareness, and a resistance to dominant cultural norms in curricula, course design, and teaching practice. It also challenges traditional educational hierarchies, such as what Freire called the banking model of education in which the teacher is always the only expert and the student is an empty vessel. When applied in the classroom, it includes viewing students as fully formed human beings with experiences and knowledge that influence how they engage with concepts and using a dialogic, or conversational, approach to teaching and learning.
Science Example 1: An ecology professor, Dr. Rachel K. Thiet (2017), reflected on her teaching practice and her students’ “sense of self” and came to the conclusion that she could enhance student learning of the science course material if they were given a voice in the learning process. Dr. Thiet created a first-day activity that allowed students to equitably and openly share their personal experiences and knowledge with both her and the other students in the class.
Science Example 2: After years of practicing critical pedagogy in their classrooms, the faculty of the College of Science and Technology decided to apply this across their curriculum. They revised their graduation requirements to include a course on the societal impact of science policy. In the course, the instructor guides and encourages the students as they critically consider their major in light of its social justice impact and its political power and influence.
Definition; The act of hijacking, exploiting, or profiting off of a non-dominant religious, ethnic, racial or spiritual identity by someone from a more or equally dominant group without attribution or wealth-sharing. Cultural appropriation is disrespectful and often reinforces stereotypes, contributing to oppression.
Science Example: In the 1990s, patents were awarded to the U.S. headquartered W.R. Grace corporation for pest control products derived from the neem plant, even though it had already been used as an insecticide by the people of India for thousands of years (Roht-Arriaza, 1996). W.R. Grace’s vice-president dismissed Indian farmers' uses of neem as more similar to “folk medicine” than science and the corporation did not plan to provide any compensation for their use of neem. Indian farmer and activist Sasha Reddy spoke with the LA Times about this appropriation, “It is of Indian origin. It is our material. It belongs to the entire nation” (Tolan, 1994).
Definition: Born at the intersection of science and social justice, cultural humility was first used in 1998 by Drs. Melanie Tervalon and Jann Murray-Garcia (1998). The concept was developed for physicians in how to treat patients from backgrounds different than their own and to correct any related injustices. More broadly, cultural humility has come to mean being both self-reflective about one’s own cultural identities and biases, and other-oriented when it comes to aspects of identity that differ from one’s own. This stance requires being non-defensive to critique of one’s own culture, as well as being committed to developing intercultural relationships that are non-paternalistic and mutually beneficial and to working toward redressing power imbalances. A core element of cultural humility is understanding that having good intentions does not change the impact of one’s actions (Waters & Asbill, 2013).
Science Example: Maria, a young fourth-year medical student doing a rotation in geriatrics, encountered a patient who was angry about having an appointment rescheduled for a month later and assumed this was another example of the entitled behavior she associated with Baby Boomer generation patients. Nonetheless, Maria talked with the patient and discovered the patient’s real source of upset was anxiety over potentially not receiving the treatment in time. This led Maria to realize that instead of assuming her older patients were simply a part of an entitled generation, she needed to recognize they have a different set of lived experiences, needs, and worries and work to better understand those things in order to treat them effectively.
Definition: Describes a trans or non-binary person’s birth name that is no longer used, usually because it doesn’t reflect their gender identity. This concept has its origins in the trans community, and it is intended to reflect the intensity of the disconnect between the trans or non-binary person’s current identity and the birth name, and to indicate the level of discomfort, disrespect, and potential danger experienced by the trans or non-binary person when someone uses that name. Deadnaming is a microaggression wherein one uses a trans or non-binary person’s birth name without consent.
Science Example: At the urging of its trans membership, The American Chemical Society (ACS) supports all requests for name changes, with no proof of the new identity required (ACS Publications, n.d.). This October 2020 policy revision only needs the preferred name to appear on the ORCiD and ACS Paragon Plus. Any searches on the ACS platform will show up with the preferred name, and any articles written with the deadname can be linked with the preferred name, as long as other co-authors agree. However, ACS has no control on what appears on other databases nor browser searches; users will have to enter both the deadname and the preferred name on these platforms to find all pertinent scholarly works.
Definition: Actions, laws, policies, etc., that ensure the environment and the people closest to it are cared for and protected, recognizing the interconnectedness between land, resources, and people. A lack of environmental justice leads to systems and companies abusing the environment while ignoring and endangering the lives of indigenous people, marginalized people, and communities in the process.
The Environmental Justice Movement is the struggle for acknowledgement of the environmental harms done and the implementation of actions, laws, policies, etc., required for environmental justice.
Science Example: Historically, toxic industries or processes have been placed in the neighborhoods of marginalized communities because people living in those areas don’t have enough political power to stop them. People who live in environmentally toxified locations are forced to advocate for themselves in the face of a dominant culture that won’t recognize or care about the harm caused to them and a lack of checks and balances for the industries that cause these harms. Specifically, many oil refineries and chemical manufacturing plants have been placed along the Mississippi River between Baton Rouge and New Orleans. This area has been the home of mainly poor Black residents who have been ignored and suppressed for centuries. When the residents noticed that the high rates of many types of cancers were killing them and brought it to the media, the term “Cancer Alley” started being used in the news reports to bring awareness to the environmental injustice. Because of this negative publicity, nearby companies now sometimes work with the residents and public health officials to reduce people’s exposure to carcinogens (Baurick, et al. 2019; Ramirez, 2020).
Definition: Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989), a Black woman lawyer and scholar, originally coined the term intersectionality in her legal argument against the way courts would only consider discrimination based on race or on gender but not both, in particular focusing on how Black women face discrimination as Black people and as women. Since Crenshaw’s introduction, the concept of intersectionality has grown well outside its framing in law; it is now considered a framework for analyzing how a person’s various identities, and associated discrimination or privilege, affect how they are treated and viewed within a society, including its political and legal systems. Intersectionality examines the interconnected and interwoven nature of the multiple facets of a person’s identity including but not limited to race, gender, sex, sexual orientation, and physical ability. While these identities are often targeted individually for oppression and discrimination, the interaction of multiple identities can further disadvantage individuals or groups that possess more than one identity.
Science Example: A climate survey of LGBT physicists by the American Physical Society found a number of examples that BIPOC LGBT physicists faced discrimination on account of the intersection of their race, gender identities, and sexual orientations (Atherton, et al. 2016). These physicists indicated they did not feel at home in either majority white LGBT groups or the majority cis and straight BIPOC organizations. The survey also found that LGBT women physicists faced exclusionary behavior at three times the rate of LGBT men.
Definition: What began as a reformative theory about criminal justice has become a movement about people, relationships, community, and reconciliation. Originally a theory and practice that brings together the harmed person, the wrongdoer, and the affected community to examine the specific harm from everyone’s viewpoint, to acknowledge the roles of the perpetrator and community in the harm, and to work toward a resolution that will benefit all who are involved. This is done through creating space for conversations among the harmed person, the affected community, and the wrongdoer in order to bring about resolution and transformation. As the concept has evolved, it has been used more broadly in a variety of settings, including academia (Pedreal, 2014; Knott, 2016; OSC Loyola, 2021), to resolve conflicts and wrongs with positive outcomes. In all cases, restorative justice remains centered on peaceful resolution to injustices and conflicts such that there is transformative change for all parties involved or affected.
Science Example: As a part of their EDI efforts, a physics department at a large research institution has decided to use a restorative justice approach for conflict resolution in research lab disputes. Knowing this is outside their field of expertise, they invite staff from their campus’ Center for Restorative Justice to meet with the faculty, staff, and students for training. When conflicts arise, a mediator from the center comes to an open department meeting where they are able to facilitate a conversation to understand the various viewpoints, working towards resolution and transformative change.
Definition: Developed by Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson (1995) in research about testing performance of Black students, and further expounded upon by Steele (1997) to examine the barriers faced by women in quantitative fields and by Black students in general, stereotype threat refers to the risk and/or fear (threat) of being seen through the lens of or confirming through one’s actions the negative stereotypes related to one’s identities. This threat can cause anxiety, doubt, and high cognitive load in situations where it arises leading to decreased performance in those situations.
Science Example 1: Research by Beasley and Fischer (2012) found there to be a higher drop-out rate or change of major for marginalized groups of undergraduate STEM majors, such as Black and Latinx students, based on performance anxiety specifically linked to their racial identity.
Science Example 2: Eduardo is a first generation Latinx student enrolled in a calculus 2 class. When the mathematics professor before the midterms and finals tells the students that the exams will test their mathematical intelligence and natural aptitude for mathematical thinking, Eduardo performs poorly on the exams and fails the course, even though he had studied the material thoroughly and practiced with great success. Eduardo repeats the course with a different professor who encourages the students prior to all exams, reminding them that the test material is what should be familiar to them from lectures and homework. This time around, Eduardo earns an A.
Definition: The practice of fulfilling current needs without jeopardizing the capability of people in the future to meet their needs. Sustainability can be seen through many lenses. Three of the most common are: social, economic, and environmental. Social sustainability is concerned with how to increase social cohesion, equality and equity, and opportunities over time, among other similar social goals. Economic sustainability attempts to provide a pathway for long term development and growth with positive outcomes for all people. Environmental sustainability involves engaging with the natural world in a way that protects and preserves it in as many ways as possible with respect to development, extraction, and study.
Science Example 1: The Eberly College of Science at Penn State University has established a Sustainability Council that works to incorporate the 17 goals of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into their college life and collaborates with their campus’ Sustainability Institute to achieve these goals (Eberly, 2020).
Science Example 2: When putting together her tenure packet, materials scientist Jennifer reached out to her liaison librarian, Charles, to help gather impact metrics for her research. Along with providing Jennifer the traditional impact metrics, Charles recommended that since their University has committed to supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that Jennifer should highlight how her research and collaborations in clean energy could be and have been used in meeting SDGs 7, 11, and 13 (DESA, 2016).
Definition: Putting forth only a symbolic or perfunctory effort to demonstrate inclusion in order to avoid/stop criticism. This may include the act of labeling a single person and their experience as a representative of an entire culture, ethnicity, or marginalized group. This allows an institution or department to project that they have made substantive changes to address inequality when in fact they are merely paying lip service to the idea of inclusion by treating individuals as checkboxes on a diversity bingo sheet. Similar to model minority, tokenism unfairly sets high expectations and places undue pressure on the person being tokenized which contributes to feelings of isolation, guilt, overextension, demoralization, and lower levels of job satisfaction on the part of individuals being used in this fashion.
Science Example: When her Chemistry department asked her to take part in some photos for their new pamphlet for prospective students, Jazmin was honored to take part. This feeling soured when the pamphlet came out and she realized that she was the only BIPOC student featured in a clear attempt to make the department appear more diverse.
Definition: A social construct that positions people with pale skin and/or those who are descended from European ancestors in a privileged social class by which all others are compared, to the detriment of those who are not identified as white. It is a system of domination that gives unearned advantages to white people and unearned disadvantages to BIPOC. Whiteness is something one is born into and/or conferred upon a person by society: if you are a white person or are seen by society as being white, you benefit from whiteness, whether or not you understand, identify as, or want to be a “white person.” It is also mythologized as an aspirational category in the American Dream, wherein those ethnic and racial groups and individuals who are able (or allowed) to assimilate convincingly enough are granted conditional entry (Smithsonian, 2019; Williams, 2020).
Whiteness is normalized, meaning that elements of culture, politics, economics, etc. that benefit the system of whiteness and are preferred by white people form the standard by which other races are compared. This reinforces whiteness as a power structure hidden even from white people themselves. It positions white people as the default and whiteness as “the way things should be” making both nearly unnamable and therefore uncriticizable. White people have the choice to never confront their own whiteness, even when they are outnumbered, because they have no experience or understanding of what it means to be minoritized. (Guess, 2006)
Science Example: New parents have for generations worried about how the growth of their infants was on pace to develop appropriately and within the norm of how other infants and toddlers grew. Until 2000, the growth charts that were used in doctor’s offices around the U.S. were based on the research of Fels Longitudinal Growth Study that had a limited sample of only formula-fed, white middle-class infants in Southwest Ohio (Carroll, 2020). This means doctors were centering whiteness as the standard by which all other infants would be compared for more than twenty years before it was revised (DHHS, 2002).